Post #12959

cc1ab9a875f157f5b86f8066262534e93becf38aa8a92b224da186428d1d20d0
ad352e8bef71d74c9d492dcd4b018c3276199132490839b0430a280f86c82347
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1551194454,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"58f0fcdf2216f1e8a92d3da16161bc7499d633789aa997589366fa14ace28ef6a83871c37810ebdbfb876df4b79117aa2056c4d16c9eeb64976c2b3fee5c2395","node_id":70,"post_date":1551194160,"thread_id":1698,"user_id":227},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/1698#post-12959"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
HashnStore SAS
Hi Mike,

Thank you for asking.

As mentioned in my candidacy post, I would focus on on-chain governance and the future non-profit organisation. Both these subjects are partially led by Standing Parties but Guides inputs are important. Work is already ongoing currently.

The non-profit should play no part in the Governance as it has been stated multiple times by the legal team. But still we need to ensure that point and to assess the potential interaction and impact on the whole ecosystem. As I am still a member of the board of a non-profit my experience can help in the discussions.

The on-chain governance and its potential impact to extend the number of the standing parties is something that I consider really important too. It will take several months to have a first iteration/implementation of this. That is why I have proposed myself to be included in the on-chain working group.

Hope this answers your questions.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top