Post #12970

cc1ab9a875f157f5b86f8066262534e93becf38aa8a92b224da186428d1d20d0
c37e48df5cab8de5a306fd6abca0892a6e25f12e40e524c74d7101aeaec70f5e
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1551203813,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"bca3c9e82b06988cac59b2108632479edd96ac81969037e229154921e7a32e355d69774fe70c68e687a866ec4b09a7f0108809461e5ac2c90cc85433b0b2b3b7","node_id":70,"post_date":1551203714,"thread_id":1698,"user_id":2},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/1698#post-12970"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
HashnStore SAS
First, thank you for stepping up as a Candidate. Putting yourself out there like this is not easy and I appreciate your willingness and desire to work for the Protocol.

1. Thank you for sharing your LinkedIn profile.

2. Certain processes such as Document Ratification require a 4/5 vote from Guides prior to the process moving on to additional Standing Parties for a vote. Do you feel this is a centralization of power in the ecosystem? Why or why not? And under what circumstances would you vote "no" and gatekeep that process from progressing?

3. Do you feel Guides should always be a Standing Party? If so, why? If not, when would you like to see the role removed?

4. It's important that our Guides be diverse in their thinking and approach to problems. Which current Guide are you most opposite to in your thinking, how so, and why is that a good thing?

Thank you.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top