Post #12972

b2d5a5689ea2c487fe677e7085ee6d61f826b2f9a8a8f75e3653746cbd6bf24c
a9f547b31b94b2dc615babf4f61a5f5cd7f9a668389cabb94c74b1faa9add8bf
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1551203874,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"92852e32010eb88efea7a103503d3f08e112b8363b3273575f7d7cf58ddd4b531d4ca524b43ce880d284a61f86d3a01b8d515f608454575cccf4e427c64dab25","node_id":70,"post_date":1551203814,"thread_id":1690,"user_id":2},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/1690#post-12972"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Centis BV
First, thank you for stepping up as a Candidate. Putting yourself out there like this is not easy and I appreciate your willingness and desire to work for the Protocol.

1. Thank you for sharing your LinkedIn.

2. Certain processes such as Document Ratification require a 4/5 vote from Guides prior to the process moving on to additional Standing Parties for a vote. Do you feel this is a centralization of power in the ecosystem? Why or why not? And under what circumstances would you vote "no" and gatekeep that process from progressing?

3. Do you feel Guides should always be a Standing Party? If so, why? If not, when would you like to see the role removed?

Thank you.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top