Post #12975

64be3f4ddaf1d88a15f3595e4c85ad2440259f18db87c6b422d4371a4085b298
4c15d9a4e5d663b4f7fd6f60514d50767337d4c6bbb738bd111267582027ce0c
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1551203935,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"fe5041fb5019dae86bcba3e0ed8e0e226697a6ef645112ea28f0a18f647d6028fc608534b491e2ff72d01550312b0bf866cbc986f80ef8b5148740bb56769929","node_id":70,"post_date":1551203932,"thread_id":1676,"user_id":2},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/1676#post-12975"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
DBGrow Inc.
First, thank you for stepping up as a Candidate. Putting yourself out there like this is not easy and I appreciate your willingness and desire to work for the Protocol.

1. Do you have a LinkedIn? If so, what is it? If not, why not?

2. Certain processes such as Document Ratification require a 4/5 vote from Guides prior to the process moving on to additional Standing Parties for a vote. Do you feel this is a centralization of power in the ecosystem? Why or why not? And under what circumstances would you vote "no" and gatekeep that process from progressing?

3. Do you feel Guides should always be a Standing Party? If so, why? If not, when would you like to see the role removed?

4. It's important that our Guides be diverse in their thinking and approach to problems. Which current Guide are you most opposite to in your thinking, how so, and why is that a good thing?

Thank you.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top