Post #13076

64be3f4ddaf1d88a15f3595e4c85ad2440259f18db87c6b422d4371a4085b298
ee7bf3236bc15b9b3e84fd3a4c1f55cb805b5d91482e1401b4a58a4fd8412801
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1551395948,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"8a131c4b58a2ab2d075165a59ecffe1d68bf094da0f0b8dc0dead57c96ceea0833f51b3a0d40696adf245453b8564ee02e6068fa10a19984bb494fd657b7fef8","node_id":70,"post_date":1551395839,"thread_id":1676,"user_id":103},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/1676#post-13076"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
DBGrow Inc.
[USER=9]@Matt Osborne[/USER] Thank you for asking!

I would fulfill the full Guide function, and expect to do 100% of the Guide work for DBGrow. Even though we are technically electing entities, we are still truly electing individuals. That being said, [USER=56]@Julian Fletcher-Taylor[/USER] plans to stay engaged with our governance development and will certainly be someone to bounce ideas off of, and even offered to help the Guides out with anything non-sensitive if a crunchtime came up. The rest of the members of DBGrow certainly have their hands full with other work in the ecosystem, whereas my work in factom will be purely focused on Guide work. Should I need to step down due to unforeseen reasons, DBGrow would push for a new election to fill the Guide position.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top