Post #13121

64be3f4ddaf1d88a15f3595e4c85ad2440259f18db87c6b422d4371a4085b298
0f00634ced89796a569f94f5ec6cce32a2df5decf584faaa5bc5274e9e4835db
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1551473479,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"5c28fee08601726a3e4a1921f6182a225a9d7f3c5b86fe188bacf5ad622163a44e7fc8ed8f5115aaef56cd12679b2ef8471bad092d84ece6c18ff16a0384eade","node_id":70,"post_date":1551473478,"thread_id":1676,"user_id":103},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/1676#post-13121"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
DBGrow Inc.
[USER=2]@David Chapman[/USER]

Currently all of my work for DBGrow is on governance and process creation, which I believe will transition seamlessly into Guide work, and will not affect other DBGrow activities. In my opinion, DBGrow is in a healthy position to support me as a Guide. DBGrow has been very supportive of me to date, and has demonstrated nothing but a commitment to support me in the Guide position going forward. DBGrow offered to let me run for Guide outside of DBGrow, and stated that they would still 100% support me and help with the transition into the Guide position. I know their support is genuine, and I decided to run for Guide with DBGrow as I fully support the rest of the DBGrow team and what they are working on, too; they've been a really great team to work with.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top