Post #19466

7fd587d7c5b2390bdff6962583e1b7d655f04c003a0db19cc8d49aeaa7d9b0ea
20467557e00124d9815a0e15066a722e4b3c5f92caf463aa075ba60cec602cad
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1568381274,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"0144a3b8f1936d48912679f03811085bb21ab124694426143eb865d3ef7cfb944a6658fc6b169a377532426a60e5f7698aa538c592da915c4a8cc5042b20d128","node_id":52,"post_date":1568381119,"thread_id":2378,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/2378#post-19466"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
ANO Election and Demotion System - Amendment proposal
That is certainly a point of view and not consensus. We have this saying in the Netherlands. "The butcher testing his own meat", meaning you need others judging and counter balancing. Just like we have seen people heavily opposed to the sponsors of the current ANO election/demotion process for various reasons, we have also seen that getting things done in this ecosystem has become worse and worse over time. The fact we only still have one standing type (besides guides), for various reasons, certainly hasn't helped in decision making, lack of oversight, the need to perform etc. But yes let's leave this for what it is right now, as this thread will close in a few hours anyway.


---
edit:
Crap, now I have threads mixed up :P
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top