Post #19477

7fd587d7c5b2390bdff6962583e1b7d655f04c003a0db19cc8d49aeaa7d9b0ea
4abd9fc3fa36e05dc9e22b91b60ee38aac628f5b54d6f144b2c63a96b3776897
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1568397397,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"01f863289a61491acc24223fe73edda87ff0db9b505a40fd507268923bb9ea025844ac8b77acda4a604659ff48536bfc3ee67e148c7c8e2dd74ab7819b7a4450","node_id":52,"post_date":1568397339,"thread_id":2378,"user_id":403},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/2378#post-19477"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
ANO Election and Demotion System - Amendment proposal
[USER=11]@Alex[/USER] [USER=227]@Matthias Fortin[/USER] Your clarifications on intent help, but when I hear "maximum ANO slots" and the number of ANOs are over that, I automatically think demotion has to happen. And unless I missed it, your original post doesn't actually clarify that automatic demotions don't happen if we are over the 'maximum' slots.

In this sense, your proposal is a way to decide when to grow the authority set, rather than the current proposed doc, which I believe the guides set? or when someone achieves 90% support. I'm assuming the 90% support would still exist even with your proposed amendment, in which case, this just removes the decision making from the guides and places it in an automated fashion, correct?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top