Post #19489

7fd587d7c5b2390bdff6962583e1b7d655f04c003a0db19cc8d49aeaa7d9b0ea
2c250cdce81ab3780c8ede5a6e46344d863b9baa9038ed67e43df6241d77c951
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1568469015,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"683715fa3e7013f1af23953be0b5798740866c0ca43165836052d6ae0fd2f65dddfb60689c091a7ea283da03ce7fdb40d150646defdb8b5c28cd4e3aa99fed54","node_id":52,"post_date":1568468944,"thread_id":2378,"user_id":84},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/2378#post-19489"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
ANO Election and Demotion System - Amendment proposal
[QUOTE="Tor Paulsen, post: 19488, member: 24"]We thought about the issue [USER=84]@Miguel Proulx[/USER] describes in the current document up for ratification and there is a solution implemented already.

If an applicant gets 90% support they get directly elected and an ANO spot created for them.... So if a big university or IBM shows up there is a viable pathway to get these elected more or less instantly.[/QUOTE]

I knew and liked that clause in the document. Wasn't sure if what Matthias was proposing would be superceeding it, thus my comment. I am a big fan of the constant election and not having hard caps based on prices. If someone wants to join in and is bringing way more value than it is costing the protocol, they should be allowed to, no matter the token price.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top