Post #2327

5fa1da7f5a546cd239fd7f427ae79109eab0be2a7ec8511c9885e3af575c226c
6414a2ef1655a470a36de1b986cfbd0462b1f40dbb88dd60497f61652eda678e
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1532465706,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"2c554c7d6d59909a0f85c1ff5083fe6d234d967508c3f8a945ab5a39b98e23761aaf3002cf867923deb7f093a1240ec35c076a162b88b2092ee1be693c6449a1","node_id":17,"post_date":1529155196,"thread_id":423,"user_id":50},"post_link":"http:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/423#post-2327"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Committee Refactor Proposal
I’m all for increasing “operational efficiency” and believe [USER=2]@DChapman[/USER] has put forth a viable solution and I support it. I know from our side...its a time issue. I believe that it would be worth some inquiry to see if other members of the community at large had any interest in filling the spots as the official Chair, Secretary, Treasurer of the committees...out of the gate. IMO it would bode well for future applicants to be entrenched in the committees....
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top