Post #24447

fcf118844bd696317240f189be85a58f24a65acb9cbd1264178b6f3b46967945
b6025f3d6b0721860ad5cac087774404584b0a2c667e23632a20e4e20c59f33f
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1581786698,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"772e6f348db1c94b379117d3a588d7af0b665667bd501b8b3adf054f0ed06ff38f9342b927c1bc2604363b638943efc62a4156f36be5fce90082138c6a37323c","node_id":52,"post_date":1581735487,"thread_id":3423,"user_id":48},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3423#post-24447"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Voting NO on anchor and Oracle master grants
I agree. The stability of the network is dependent on having an anchor mechanism and an oracle to maintain Entry Credit valuation. If we decide to cut those without a viable replacement, we are potentially slitting our own throats. Build an alternative and propose a competitor and now we are talking. If these had passed, we would've been injecting more chaos into an already painfully unpredictable system. We should be governing smartly and not trying to create fires just so we are forced to put them out.

my .02 here
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top