Post #24548

fcf118844bd696317240f189be85a58f24a65acb9cbd1264178b6f3b46967945
091f71e6e66b95e8b85c5caac462d1ca93f8a5122354274b8ddd635743ee7d27
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1581791931,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"c263ce2538c6f44fa5ae968f3bcebe9628a0072c321eafb8769b126416ba2f5f0a8ff299e12bb7fbe930819f527793773a526ffc34f17bc1d6849118f75ccef1","node_id":52,"post_date":1581791880,"thread_id":3423,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3423#post-24548"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Voting NO on anchor and Oracle master grants
[USER=24]@Tor Paulsen[/USER] I get you are pissed about it. I probably of most people given our company 's lack of updates.

But saying No to two very important functions in the core protocol, without an alternative and just hoping that somebody would still do it as backpay grant is setting a very dangerous precedent IMO.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top