Post #24562

fcf118844bd696317240f189be85a58f24a65acb9cbd1264178b6f3b46967945
f11b54a97eac1bfbc34d5595f13d784ed2346c9e74402e92d1c8a022877adf85
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1581799131,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"735969239b4eef36babd6e797562867ab84d88c3212bc99e402efdf486d2458874b7ad3b592677be3fcab5ee8a6744cfc11badf7f725b5cd2d955f39afcbed39","node_id":52,"post_date":1581798999,"thread_id":3423,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3423#post-24562"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Voting NO on anchor and Oracle master grants
Tor has been very clear about his intention to vote no in both the anchor and the oracle grant.

So [USER=48]@Nolan Bauer[/USER] [USER=8]@Niels Klomp[/USER] , here's an idea:

You could have addressed this during the actual grant discussion to ask Tor for an alternative or push Factom Inc to answer Tor's concerns so people might be swayed to vote in favor. [B]Especially [/B]as fellow guides and [B]especially [/B]if you have grant discussion / monitoring in your [URL='https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nSvg2WxRgz9_51_yqR4bIZsEKq6yxw5UXu9R4G80U3Q/edit']task list.[/URL]

I'd say that beats bringing this up after the fact.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top