Post #24971

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
d03e0749f8dd46af9ac636cdf4a40a0be65d5cb6cf3391c42c737032cab9acb0
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582157872,"post_data":{"edit_count":4,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"085fcba5df12bf7994e2a8c96361de3929b666150d1faedb446783ba95be87fdffb9cbdc128ba2c1026cfb07343ad7c974f0730637e049eb340e087958a43e43","node_id":59,"post_date":1582157638,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":2},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-24971"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 24968, member: 8"]
I don't think people are questioning whether you will deliver, but a bit more info?

Open-source? proprietary? Factom? PegNet? Forum? Any idea of timeline?
[/QUOTE]
I'll just cut and paste with a small edit:

[quote]Yep, we understanding that the lack of details is frustrating and rightly so. I guess we would just ask that the community look back at all the contributions [S]Go Immutable[/S] Factomize has made over the last year (scroll-up and see dropdowns at the top of this thread), the countless hours of grunt work and non-enviable tasks we have tackled, and simply give us the benefit of the doubt (while obviously also holding us accountable). I'd like to think we've at least earned the benefit of the doubt at this point in time.[/quote]

If this ecosystem isn't going to demand more and hold people accountable, I don't see why I should make the effort. As being transparent and communicating well does take some effort.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top