Post #24979

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
6d9c18c16c7feda9ffd8709606603d944d418347bfa41500c0d95ba877ce9cc3
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582160296,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"bfa1636fce5e9ae2c73db9ad92341b829d6518a488577386e4c7f54c0b5df80f6e30011f7a8bb153f11b79958b7dc3c6ece1a833ffe9fd9c38509d3006125c1e","node_id":59,"post_date":1582159926,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-24979"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
Nope was not a roundabout way. You know I am not like that. I think it is obvious I will support it. But the interesting part is that some people are hell bend on providing all kinds of details, yet at the same time we are totally fine with projects we know nothing about and which were definitely not voted by consensus (that is a good thing at the same time, but that is another discussion).

Just asking the questions here, because some people for whatever reasons don't dare or care I guess
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top