Post #24979
-
-
Signature not verified
This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.
-
-
{"entry_date":1582160296,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"bfa1636fce5e9ae2c73db9ad92341b829d6518a488577386e4c7f54c0b5df80f6e30011f7a8bb153f11b79958b7dc3c6ece1a833ffe9fd9c38509d3006125c1e","node_id":59,"post_date":1582159926,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-24979"}The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
-
-
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
-
-
Nope was not a roundabout way. You know I am not like that. I think it is obvious I will support it. But the interesting part is that some people are hell bend on providing all kinds of details, yet at the same time we are totally fine with projects we know nothing about and which were definitely not voted by consensus (that is a good thing at the same time, but that is another discussion).
Just asking the questions here, because some people for whatever reasons don't dare or care I guessThis is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.