Post #24980

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
a6cb50797c671a8237de98831cb600fea26814b761797ca7e50584b058f2795f
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582160924,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"5e0c27a9efb9c9780a46237578800b4d5e4c0c184b38b3e158d13f3da2c7fce3608605902c35e7dbd2f7889160e74d1781d29b2a736ca07ea5bbd34f8b6a52cd","node_id":59,"post_date":1582160824,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":48},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-24980"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
I support this change for the reason being I support the independence that ANOs have on setting their own efficiency and the historical track record Factomize has had in the past. Additionally, Factomize has been responsible in raising their efficiency when the proposed projects have completed. I only ask for updates if you can provide them.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top