Post #25029

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
36ea589b5dc545ffc55ca37f2a08ddc3ce21cbb8081dd6e967d76f5f7c415b2e
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582188328,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"5faba8a0b76ef1e5fb6f1fee09687f64f367916f6d2471b221c016c9909d33d2bbae3ee7280a04b3a18ccb9e1a47ea31faaf3e473d578bb0bffb628bda0724f7","node_id":59,"post_date":1582188313,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":35},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25029"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
[QUOTE="Alex, post: 25026, member: 11"]
Should Factoshi go to 0% too? I feel a mystery project coming on...
[/QUOTE]
Not sure if sarcasm is relevant Alex :)
I don’t think that David would ruin Factomize reputation in the Factom ecosystem with low accountability and under-performance at their chosen efficiency.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top