Post #25030

Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
[QUOTE="Anton Ilzheev, post: 25029, member: 35"]
Not sure if sarcasm is relevant Alex :)
I don’t think that David would ruin Factomize reputation in the Factom ecosystem with low accountability and under-performance at their chosen efficiency.

Sarcasm or not, there've been a lot of 'mystery projects' as of late. You tell me how many of those have worked out up to this point. I don't doubt Factomize's ability to deliver, but in the way this is worded, this triggers copycat behaviour and conversely many more non-productive discussions.

Thankfully we have a fix for that.

[USER=24]@Tor Paulsen[/USER] I think a logical step to take is for the guides to discuss David's proposed efficiency bracket system, work out a real proposal based on ANO feedback and put it to a vote. Tying efficiency ranges to standing would prevent copycat behaviour by those who lack the standing to.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.