Post #25048

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
c46c5b35bc6a89efd9a508b12fdf89cff0da6f4caa31c247d981ff3104679698
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582214454,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"0d983779a26409587dfcefcb83fea2284001dd0b4c2adadfb5415d6bf70b7facd3f144e819d7d85313c9fd06513c786cbf0d390d02efa93324ff86a19d4f72ad","node_id":59,"post_date":1582214309,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":413},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25048"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
Sorry, is this a joke or a test? I'm confused, same with [USER=9]@Matt Osborne[/USER]'s thread about testing ANOs by dropping to 10% efficiency? We're going to have problems if we can't operate 'in good faith'. It's not healthy if I have to assume people are trying to trick me.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top