Post #25054

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
51343697c7f9473ddf745a5e41624cf59765f7c6e05229d1c98de925671fe3dc
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582215288,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"f166ef9e6ba5f0ebdf6acc6244ec97b0c8d9abe22a5978077af70bf210c9960574724d1520aa40c09a9178963c97990ef95fcde1ce5849f3224a21c1fe9377e1","node_id":59,"post_date":1582215186,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25054"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
[USER=2]@David Chapman[/USER], can we get more information about this efficiency change? Factoshi needs to be able to assess whether Factomize's efficiency is commensurate with your contributions and that is not possible without further information.

How long do you expect this efficiency change to last? What kind of benefit is the protocol likely to see? What are the odds that you will be successful? When can we know more?

I trust Factomize if you tell me that you cannot reveal all the details, but allowing prolonged periods of low efficiency without explanation would set a very poor precedent, even for one of our most trusted and hard working ANOs.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top