Post #25211

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
f6d9948b52d7614691e18fdde54683e139eb0d1e859aafb957f531ad1fef18c6
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582315064,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"5b3539f12767f646c9e469e157646344e0022da2fa0bd5bd34229cf237ed8f5c281d4e23defae815057e68472ce8bedd143ade293be835df295dc63aa0250404","node_id":59,"post_date":1582315022,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":2},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25211"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
[QUOTE="Tor Paulsen, post: 25209, member: 24"]
how will you decide what to develop? Standing party consensus? if so, how will that consensus be met?

Also, why do this through lowered efficiency instead of grants which has seemingly served you well before?
[/QUOTE]
Some projects we'll just do, others we'll seek input from specific parties, others we'll seek consensus on specific aspects, and others we may seek full Standing Party consensus. It depends on the work.

I proposed that all ANOs be at a specific efficiency and all additional work go through the grant pool. That idea was shot down so here we are.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top