Post #25219

fcf118844bd696317240f189be85a58f24a65acb9cbd1264178b6f3b46967945
fa49b8d9be0b20cd20b815c2f9e3318b146b9acbe837b3d607b68216d563a730
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582319773,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"0c98ae76c3cf6ba9cad8f7765b4c728a562a778126ff3c2cdbcf230461e706d3a9349ab8b6c088ab172a6519ab3a6289b12d9de4c7ba58eb9ad92b0f0bbef3ff","node_id":52,"post_date":1582319720,"thread_id":3423,"user_id":413},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3423#post-25219"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Voting NO on anchor and Oracle master grants
I think we definitely want to decentralize the oracle and anchor. I actually had no idea it wasn't decentralized (shame shame). In most protocols that require an oracle, each node operator runs an oracle. What's the feasibility of this for Factom? In terms of the anchor, I believe we should anchor into Bitcoin as it is currently the most robust POW protocol. Is there anyway we could have the anchoring rotate between ANOs in some way?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top