Post #25308

f89abdc1fe5dd5421f1b095690938218858ca6b9a18d0e75bbcb8f101fdc8142
f9335eba26acc1369079fec334b9ba0cc1351f62e390b8218bfe66c24789a88b
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582376451,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"37353469bb01195ff220f035487dd07ddec52f0fcc8f727d6e6651d9c0e139569b4b3550bed39a8b7b14f05644b6b1980bb7b351c750e74b0a5f6c1b543edfdd","node_id":102,"post_date":1582376372,"thread_id":3792,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3792#post-25308"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for Kompendium
I really lack perspective for accommodating bigger entities both on the technical sides, voting decisions not being thought through with respect to larger users of the protocol and people thinking they can objectify everything.

I am afraid it is reaching a point where the opposite of what the protocol strives to do will happen.

Yes maybe the most open protocol in history with all kinds of reporting. Also the protocol that accommodates 1 or 2 person ANOs and entities only. It is this lack of being able to take the perspective of larger entities into mind when trying to build it out that I regard as almost a systemic risk at this point
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top