Post #25315

a3323b503cfbe35b59b0bbd0915804be0dc396fe18c2de3d7ebc2e06a7899139
c74a6c600b9c79f789f58f1d42d6bbc4bf0a69f9081211f3dc2030a72188279f
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582379212,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"6dd5010c03047f133bbf3d65e325d4428930f11377efeb150d327ccdce200b27338c0d8373d013d0d9475a27753594f10846da3cb3ce3835e800ccb7ba2ad733","node_id":102,"post_date":1582378877,"thread_id":3806,"user_id":84},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3806#post-25315"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for BI Foundation
[QUOTE="WB, post: 25293, member: 175"]
Would you agree with me that the larger players, i.e. Factom Inc, Sphereon, and formerly Multicoin already have a special status compared to smaller ANOs?
[/QUOTE]

Standing parties have done a good job making sure they are held to the same standard as others.

I think we should feel privileged to have big entities in our ranks, not the other way around. I certainly would not expect a Google like entity to spend any time doing governance work.

Our governance should be leaner to accommodate this type of entities. For our governance to be leaner, it should start with a flat infra only governance and for those who likes to play politics, we would have a grant system that would allow it.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top