Post #25326
-
-
Signature not verified
This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.
-
-
{"entry_date":1582381847,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"7b43390a56bd999f70c1aaff8faa0534147602a71f7dd74318c0c82aba4d25d3a0f8f2802ee865500433fb903f8502b5d19ca64567021c401a723eca7c038912","node_id":102,"post_date":1582381821,"thread_id":3806,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3806#post-25326"}The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
-
-
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for BI Foundation
-
-
Tor, I think I have explained in this thread an entity like BIF/Sphereon is not gonna play exactly as you want them to. We have more to consider than only the protocol. At the same time I certainly hope people do not question what we are doing for the protocol.
Thinking that removing standing will expedite us moving, is not happening I can tell you that. We will however think about what people discuss about our company and how that impacts our clients and whether we want to be part of that. So yes you can stick to your personal core values, but these aren't necessarily aligned by all parties.
If you believe that removing standing over reporting, whilst you know we are doing more than most parties here versus providing standing for some parties that do next to nothing but do report is the proper action. Sure do that. It just really isn't helping I think.This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.