Post #25328

a3323b503cfbe35b59b0bbd0915804be0dc396fe18c2de3d7ebc2e06a7899139
4a3ce46642682461c9c270e69f9b0d509970c65eca79f17300395ef790a1118e
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582382861,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"c26ad26fb12ea540db49f56c7f16baea3f0ea800fef6ddf46c2c965db89ffa4419b2e7764df5390069a3c84e82bfde24c381f30aaaa906ea3b7364ede2613b3c","node_id":102,"post_date":1582382833,"thread_id":3806,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3806#post-25328"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for BI Foundation
Well you can disagree all you want and that is fine. I am pointing out that as a company we will not risk this type of thinking (and calling out we have seen as well). Just like MC we will re-evaluate our involvement if we see the push for "objectiveness" and involvement continuing into a direction that only suits small entities. Because for us that ties into the potential success we see for the protocol as a whole
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top