Post #25339

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
6279e474093d411ddac3f4e6b620c3114adeeb0c92fead9852ee1c3fe1d91f8d
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582386651,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"bfc6feeecf5eb64e59756557d01081f2922a4886d4b5e30c4579f5a3a02fd686445fecac8e2644204978a4427e99bd2a00d28e84e6dbe91fdefee9553af2e4da","node_id":59,"post_date":1582386409,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":2},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25339"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
As two Standing Parties ([USERGROUP=23]@Factomatic[/USERGROUP] and [USER=24]@Tor Paulsen[/USER]) have set arbitrary "X% Efficiency or lower we remove Standing" benchmarks rather than evaluate on case by case basis that have resulted in Factomize losing Standing, we have decided not to move forward with these projects. We cannot risk more Standing Parties taking on those benchmarks and Factomize's future be at risk.

As such, we will not further the protocol at lower efficiency and our dev will no doubt be seeing work outside this ecosystem.

We will be increasing our efficiency back up to 40%.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top