Post #25345

d67b0a90303ff40f2137a4f2bda003412c8d89bd377cc01e6cea7a9776b625fe
34358c4fcfac0d7c67f48b32474237317c49258e3addf0729543ebc33a6c7e76
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582387345,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"1699d16d4647554cb52fd407a433f1e83cd30144ccbdc44bf6cb13a5b6d72a13d07233035321f83c62df71ab24dac316acf61bfa9690f56b4ea72d0f5741aea3","node_id":102,"post_date":1582387133,"thread_id":3815,"user_id":2},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3815#post-25345"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Gave Standing for Factomize
[QUOTE="Tor Paulsen, post: 25343, member: 24"]
After I removed standing you still had 81% left; well above the 40% cutoff. Putting your decision of firing your dev on me is not exactly fair is it?
[/QUOTE]
When it was just one Standing Party setting an arbitrary number for efficiency it was no big deal. Two makes a trend and we're not going to risk others piling on board once we've begun these projects.

An arbitrary number like this rather than evaluating on case by case basis is lazy and stupid.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top