Post #25348

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
bb236b12fa947bc6b531f98f7a5c961289688fcd64f18a06b87c69869175a408
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582387345,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"abd480edb29263ebe18dfbe7f85a7b86cccb67a915719fac7521712a58548718ed4130bc57827fc0c8257ecff205e5070a611a2a53b1eadc728e2a488f3fb850","node_id":59,"post_date":1582387337,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":24},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25348"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
I would trust Factomize to operate at 0% efficiency, as I know David very well and their track record is stellar.

This is a principle decision because I do not believe our current system is able to properly assess how well low-efficiency ANOs are operating (just look at all the discontent we've seen the past year), and my opinion as a guide is development requiring an entity to operate at those low levels should be handled via the grant pool.

If Factomize decides to say "fuck it", fire their devs, and blame me for that while still having 81% support after I removed standing.. Well that's their decision.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top