Post #25350

a3323b503cfbe35b59b0bbd0915804be0dc396fe18c2de3d7ebc2e06a7899139
e7894a8ad70648e70706f93b8119ad77ae64af80597aed57e9303dc205c2274c
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582387435,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"51dbb279a2a23a06cbdcce01b2278052f44cfb8eb5278b9c9eef1ffc48dd63029a6a04cf6185794aa43247986223b16587b645ce878d77809ded36688bc4f339","node_id":102,"post_date":1582387350,"thread_id":3806,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3806#post-25350"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for BI Foundation
I agree the update thing is a bit arbitrary, as I certainly wouldn't have re-instated standing for such a tongue-in-cheek update. ;)

Again, I'm not sure you really need to fear smaller parties influencing the way you need to act.

Yes, smaller parties have a vote, much like Malta has a vote in the European Union. And their vote matters as much as Germany's. It's the system we decided on, but it's the forging of consensus that matters and so far the consensus seems to be (91% standing) that Sphereon is trusted enough that people forgive you for the lack of updates.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top