Post #25360

a3323b503cfbe35b59b0bbd0915804be0dc396fe18c2de3d7ebc2e06a7899139
51a23ee0b15a29a3bff7072d12b085bc8a680d239cd8d21b084f8b4e767f76df
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582388454,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"4cf59f31292ff890d1c6691a4377ee9e8a03505dde183c5510e24fe19f5325b74b49e2f2f3b654a0c272eabf84ca56bdca5b27ce4ac1da434abac21a2ecc4997","node_id":102,"post_date":1582388380,"thread_id":3806,"user_id":2},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3806#post-25360"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for BI Foundation
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 25359, member: 8"]
This also ties into standing being binary at this moment.

If it would be a scale of 0-10 for instance with 4 being "No standing" I am pretty sure Tor would not have scored us a 4 or below. But instead of let's say an 8 would give us a 6 or 7 because of it. Removing standing is nonsense IMO
[/QUOTE]
Standing being binary is fine as long as people don't have nonsense "deal breakers" that penalize high performing ANOs because they don't take into consideration all their other work.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top