Post #25361

a3323b503cfbe35b59b0bbd0915804be0dc396fe18c2de3d7ebc2e06a7899139
5d0258a77fc3023ea906e7c5d113fee8df0cee9206968638477792aabe076db3
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582388453,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"d8de2493112b7fe00bcfd9a8cb03b3e64aae1a907a5844a4c3a03b1efba1b9e8d3e9703e24aaf24cad0981e13c715df66ce4fdd4250f9e0a27b4de9065d87a94","node_id":102,"post_date":1582388392,"thread_id":3806,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3806#post-25361"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for BI Foundation
[QUOTE="Tor Paulsen, post: 25358, member: 24"]
Standing is not necessarily a combination of factors. In fact each standing party may use what criteria they like to extend standing one of my "dealbreakers" is 30% efficiency or lower. It is also not the only one as evident by all the standing I extended to other parties today, with reasons provided.
[/QUOTE]
Ok so you really believe that every entity making up their own rules/ratings and then voting binary on any entity breaking a single rule in these without having them discussed up front or giving them time to react is gonna work?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top