Post #25362

a3323b503cfbe35b59b0bbd0915804be0dc396fe18c2de3d7ebc2e06a7899139
893dd5363c737a634b9665ae5ea4ba8a84fd6c8e9fe9eb471b9e0d6759e24109
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582388570,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"3258304fa524f8eac3e02434b124676883186c9e72b37c039dbed3194930b6caddc988f907e95204624bac245d14be07bb16ccef33f32d1f5c14378975cefcd4","node_id":102,"post_date":1582388479,"thread_id":3806,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3806#post-25362"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for BI Foundation
[QUOTE="David Chapman, post: 25360, member: 2"]
Standing being binary is fine as long as people don't have nonsense "deal breakers" that penalize high performing ANOs because they don't take into consideration all their other work.
[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah totally agree, but in both this case as well as your case, I think entities would not have voted no-standing at all tbh. But yes, standing by definition is a combination of factors. Not sure why this is being negated by Tor tbh
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top