Post #25554

f89abdc1fe5dd5421f1b095690938218858ca6b9a18d0e75bbcb8f101fdc8142
ced9586ff78f6b10bb00676c35b12e26f00945a34384201347b22e33a6d16f99
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582547933,"post_data":{"edit_count":2,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"d1c63e12c3cc28656f61aa80409e0b0642d1d2629a6afc5cf1f585b5556e3bc02fdef2917f4ba3275de9b047fedb86faa5963dedc0bbe9d7837de652b45207b9","node_id":102,"post_date":1582547614,"thread_id":3792,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3792#post-25554"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Tor Paulsen Removed Standing for Kompendium
Yes info like that in itself is fine, until people start suggesting to use it for standing or not awarding grant proposals, because party X is already net negative. I do hope you see that in automation that quite easily becomes the next step.

Something like that never paints the complete picture and moves parties that arguable bring the most value in an almost impossible position as they typically cannot disclose all their financials and investments.

I do hope that people can logically deduct overall potential dangerous movements when you try to objectify everything (which is impossible, as I hopefully explained with above examples)
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top