Post #25563

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
fccd1f37c40ad38af12e082377f9329a1ba9bd5a3d2a572b29f5cc2efe0ba605
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582564188,"post_data":{"edit_count":2,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"e9df02f51939a437acba131e52d50d2a625f9e2f011c90030ba18c22aad13b82f8c51b28a433abc54f9f7235dacdaa902ee557ae4e2cd76ca6d372350c9593b9","node_id":59,"post_date":1582564092,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":227},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25563"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
I really do not see the issue here. It is the diversity of the point of views which determinates the final standing score.
And honestly, at some point everything is arbitrary. Even a score grid is as Factomize or HashnStore did.

Moreover in your case, even by decreasing to 0% efficiency, I suspect you are likely to keep one of the highest standing score, at least for some time.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top