Post #25568

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
4ce3c727de683b36e3bddc5ff67e98d06eeaa4b659ee124cccb37e3dec85bd45
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582570049,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"c409d92b9e3a60623b4635471917f5858c69dc28b225835457df9bbc93fc6185b61912222715495f60994aac58e8f3a05211d375f18c75b8b866bbb4510d36da","node_id":59,"post_date":1582569954,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25568"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
[QUOTE="Valentin Ganev, post: 25555, member: 114"]
We never said that operating at 10% or above efficiency automatically grants you Standing in our books. Our voting indicates so, as we have removed Standing from several ANOs operating at a significantly higher efficiency. We said that operating at below 10% efficiency will automatically mean we remove Standing at this point in time and the two are very different. If an infra ANO goes to 15%, they will be evaluated based on their contributions, same as anyone else operating at >=10% efficiency.
[/QUOTE]
I did change it around on purpose. Simply because you apparently use certain criteria I do not know (well I know the 10% now) as a binary point wrg to standing. So to be really clear above 10% you start measuring contributions?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top