This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 25568, member: 8"]
I did change it around on purpose. Simply because you apparently use certain criteria I do not know (well I know the 10% now) as a binary point wrg to standing. So to be really clear above 10% you start measuring contributions?
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 25569, member: 8"]
If that is the case it makes more sense. But in the vote you only mentioned the 10%. You literally said you are not supporting ANOs at these levels. If it is part of multiple factors for me it totally makes sense to me.
Yes, we only start measuring contributions above a 10% efficiency. Having above 10% efficiency definitely does not constitute automatic Standing in our books and we have in fact removed Standing from several ANOs operating at higher efficiency, due to different reasons. Having below 10% efficiency, results in automatic No Standing, as we believe every ANO should be doing their fair share of contributions to the grant pool, regardless of ANO contributions.