Post #25575

7c9296462aae60af2480f8d9459123fa8234490947f2358d0998fd80d3cd9c90
3b21c1542d16d3a14eb5d275a932743f783849ff505ff4411f62bed11efbc9c6
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1582575893,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":1582575823,"last_edit_user_id":114,"message_sha512":"f7aaf776bb259f0559e0edb5f98e71c242e88fad91a65a9f8d9507dd94dfd52d828bf83567682d1515bf86a12bea0ead94543aafa9f075abd4650f44d7d1f8fc","node_id":59,"post_date":1582575031,"thread_id":3684,"user_id":114},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/3684#post-25575"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factomize has lowered its efficiency to 0%
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 25568, member: 8"]
I did change it around on purpose. Simply because you apparently use certain criteria I do not know (well I know the 10% now) as a binary point wrg to standing. So to be really clear above 10% you start measuring contributions?
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 25569, member: 8"]
If that is the case it makes more sense. But in the vote you only mentioned the 10%. You literally said you are not supporting ANOs at these levels. If it is part of multiple factors for me it totally makes sense to me.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, we only start measuring contributions above a 10% efficiency. Having above 10% efficiency definitely does not constitute automatic Standing in our books and we have in fact removed Standing from several ANOs operating at higher efficiency, due to different reasons. Having below 10% efficiency, results in automatic No Standing, as we believe every ANO should be doing their fair share of contributions to the grant pool, regardless of ANO contributions.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top