This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.
{"entry_date":1588330147,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"cfeb744bdca1b722b921813eb1021f6e6b84ce4210b27eacb43ce3d5e89684e0c17b1ed28aae74fd152734e04ebf912d0fd886ea7d8a94eda232d480aabf89b2","node_id":53,"post_date":1588330143,"thread_id":4780,"user_id":48},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/4780#post-27612"}
Batched Amendment - Removal of Guides from Governance
Thanks [USER=122]@CryptoLogic[/USER] for reviewing the documents. I think your discovery of doc 107 is accurate and I would suggest we edit it to reflect available FCT be approved prior to voting, not round closure.
As for what to do should the standing parties not approve the available FCT? I would assume the round is determined invalid due to lack of agreement on the available FCT. Without Guides, ANOs need to step up and take a little more responsibility in this. By next round I suspect we will have a cleaned up ability to determine the grant pool amount that can be independently audited with relative ease by the standing parties so it will only require verification and approval.
I’ll make the edits today to doc 107 reflecting the correct timeline for approval of final grant pool amount.