Post #27612

58e8e02fd8915293cf0a4d39b394606c225f01bcf5dd6f4f564aab2f41abdc7a
d466829810d0d0df0bec0a510288fc2dab1b2b406328a307ac09472e4ee157ab
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1588330147,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"cfeb744bdca1b722b921813eb1021f6e6b84ce4210b27eacb43ce3d5e89684e0c17b1ed28aae74fd152734e04ebf912d0fd886ea7d8a94eda232d480aabf89b2","node_id":53,"post_date":1588330143,"thread_id":4780,"user_id":48},"post_link":"https:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/4780#post-27612"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Removal of Guides from Governance
Thanks [USER=122]@CryptoLogic[/USER] for reviewing the documents. I think your discovery of doc 107 is accurate and I would suggest we edit it to reflect available FCT be approved prior to voting, not round closure.

As for what to do should the standing parties not approve the available FCT? I would assume the round is determined invalid due to lack of agreement on the available FCT. Without Guides, ANOs need to step up and take a little more responsibility in this. By next round I suspect we will have a cleaned up ability to determine the grant pool amount that can be independently audited with relative ease by the standing parties so it will only require verification and approval.

I’ll make the edits today to doc 107 reflecting the correct timeline for approval of final grant pool amount.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top