Post #29885

206ad4b2d009244e702811a82bd47f4c1ae87310af69611c748279fa2cdb1d2d
9b96afc6a761e14dc633cd479b023b1be7b8f72439f067e0d01d7fcd0fd3520d
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1597353423,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"6a6feb536479239106940f44a9a95b5f351db52db007bf8bf7f23aa46d4e66a997ae02421bdd18bed5f44c89e3534529b54826a5b0e556b5d4ced1261102975b","node_id":2,"post_date":1597353321,"thread_id":5232,"user_id":117},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/index.php?threads\/5232#post-29885"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
FPoS – Federated Proof-of-Stake
[QUOTE="Anton Ilzheev, post: 29863, member: 35"]
[URL unfurl="true"]https://koinshare.com/2020/08/09/united-states-congress-members-appeals-for-reasonable-tax-on-digital-currency-staking-rewards/[/URL]
[/QUOTE]

That is still not decided, only being considered. Like FPoS ;) Also it does not address the point that with the incentive to stake many holders will do so. Which in turn leads to a diminishing dividend.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top