Post #29886

206ad4b2d009244e702811a82bd47f4c1ae87310af69611c748279fa2cdb1d2d
4ba8ca8782f5506238cad15040f242c5fa204731659b52867687a266c58c8c00
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1597385222,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"b155388d0be266d4df14e9ccc2b6b911adc95d443007d56771bbfcca944011ea3b07c4341687c9552280997364333884f3d68c44af1655f7e855c5aff855578c","node_id":2,"post_date":1597385202,"thread_id":5232,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/index.php?threads\/5232#post-29886"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
FPoS – Federated Proof-of-Stake
[QUOTE="Hinamatsuri, post: 29885, member: 117"]
Also it does not address the point that with the incentive to stake many holders will do so. Which in turn leads to a diminishing dividend.
[/QUOTE]

I don't think this is a problem. It is the same in any blockchain system that supplies incentives. Bitcoin miners also get diminishing returns with a higher hashrate. The system constantly rebalances as incentives increase or decrease.

Many holders taking part sounds like a positive thing to me.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top