Post #30170

206ad4b2d009244e702811a82bd47f4c1ae87310af69611c748279fa2cdb1d2d
ad53c2198868ebe9622c2e2a1e2c9974aae455a397cf1d2211c8a75577d433ef
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1599492490,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"32062182ad47696e47ec747080ed75758e94c250fd5a378ddf8e793f4768189cc47fab0ed4a2cdd8c211398d83e62349fac226093ffa289eaec5708b94e6e319","node_id":2,"post_date":1599492490,"thread_id":5232,"user_id":211},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/fpos-%E2%80%93-federated-proof-of-stake.5232\/post-30170"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
FPoS – Federated Proof-of-Stake
Piggybacking off of What Colin said, what substantial progress has the working group made-that can be shared. We all understand how intricate all this can be but any sort of basic update would be greatly appreciated.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top