Post #30244

0273b5b6a665785d1c3a5cc5cd8f24a065755f9588f4361ad62e3b3f199910a1
710cc4a054feeb79df64d58f9a6fac89c84c0227d2ac63e99333b95a1b857fd7
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1600720703,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"1af534aa98e6676e7c9a3455bafbe827c774fa8613c95e6f0b5c8daf752c7013eaf3e6b3d0bc0a75904820548d530a131e92505590ec664ed4cd9695b7473ed9","node_id":59,"post_date":1600720648,"thread_id":5424,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/efficiency-change-and-ano-announcement.5424\/post-30244"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Efficiency Change and ANO Announcement
Thanks, [USER=125]@Keith Pincombe[/USER]. I still want to be part of Factom's future if possible as I think I have more to offer. I hope we will be in a much stronger position within a year and I will be able to reapply myself fully, though I fear that there are few indications we will achieve that. Time will tell.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top