Post #30265

a33a2d919d67dda813b6e852e6a48cf3391277050c4166c9da0556f2dcbc9603
c263d451f3978c3d605abb84efa239eb235f4414e2006628e87a62ef356a6333
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1601075454,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"8ffcd6cbcd706496da60346e25cd9d7232d2504c9db88074e0d8716c1e22bba121727c8e874c6a93c500c5a13dd4c24aec5daa35f470a9f5d79002dd3b5358d4","node_id":14,"post_date":1601075454,"thread_id":5427,"user_id":32},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/separate-grant-tracking-threads-for-anchor-and-oracle-master-grants.5427\/post-30265"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Separate grant tracking threads for Anchor and Oracle master grants
Anton, thanks for your initiative.

Could you quickly explain your reasons and the expected benefits and possible challenges if this proposal were implemented?

thank you
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top