Post #30431

89e07985ced1dd1773a4830e98fdc53a0bcc66ff98405e890865ab4eb803a0df
758bc73422fd7240c2e32acaa611556e236e18c7c9f5346376b5066d2bc7272e
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1603725967,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"5f06cf1530bad3b69964ca9c1810910191452bebfe03930dcda35be5647ee25f100ba35f8e9bc3135380d49190bc223edc2f17635d7bb838deabcd6a3436f810","node_id":52,"post_date":1603725967,"thread_id":5539,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/grant-round-2020-4-final-amount-v2-vote.5539\/post-30431"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Grant Round 2020.4 Final Amount V2 vote
I am fine either way. I think there is something to be said for 3% given there are leftover FCT from previous round regardless and 3% being the safe option if other ANO(s) decide to lower their efficiency. Then there is still a little bit reserved for stuff like the currently paused bug bounty program
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top