Post #30446

89e07985ced1dd1773a4830e98fdc53a0bcc66ff98405e890865ab4eb803a0df
b06afa5993dba2588c1ef644b8d931000fd1dbe202b5b12d6489a243d2bd4a1a
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1603823553,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"5a15ae8b2e33270f2807643d41951b8807583bd5e9d0af24a9f53aac6037fa420d70c939715bc90dceceb817e6fc02d35aa96fa3652513a9b3f65621dfc05f3d","node_id":52,"post_date":1603823553,"thread_id":5539,"user_id":29},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/grant-round-2020-4-final-amount-v2-vote.5539\/post-30446"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Grant Round 2020.4 Final Amount V2 vote
Still happy with 1%.

I see no reason for wider margins. (Not needing the margin does not justify higher margins)

Mitigation of an overrun is easily addressed. We can do one or more of the following:
[LIST=1]
[*]Adjust the limit prior to closing grant discussions.
[*]Reduce grants proportionately before activation
[*]Ignore the temporary over issue of tokens, as it self corrects quickly
[*]Delay activation until tokens are available
[/LIST]
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top