Post #30447

89e07985ced1dd1773a4830e98fdc53a0bcc66ff98405e890865ab4eb803a0df
3cbb4c5307ef0ecd7acab6ae0d85cc6435603cc26c20c40f5fc1636f6f5f289b
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1603827395,"post_data":{"edit_count":2,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"b512f753eaeb1694cfe457e64a575c14cd9500c33ac782e1c5b328c347cf80435944260439b27513fc0adc5bdaa00faf1ade947a73e060c36e76498bc2b508f4","node_id":52,"post_date":1603827346,"thread_id":5539,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/grant-round-2020-4-final-amount-v2-vote.5539\/post-30447"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Grant Round 2020.4 Final Amount V2 vote
[USER=29]@PaulSnow[/USER] That all deviates from what we have in governance. Can we please just keep this simple and go with the 170K. I think everyone in here has better things to discuss than the 1% or 3%.

As soon as the vote is open, I hope everyone is okay with voting for 170K FCT for this round as proposed by [USER=48]@Nolan Bauer[/USER] .
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top