Post #30717

6358d296220529e175d14dcce043605e18ede6ccb4683d9f71c36443a39d3475
00038ac098974e1f37f020e50f56e9c00224d661a38e5270e1e082e6b444838d
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1604699521,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"623ac5f9dc50e5582fa0d786d48c7ef2df093009c39f3e5b8c604c141e645365e2ffcc9119af44be9734a63d9c91e8d2b9d6f118f7ffbd0919989b3c2426acc2","node_id":53,"post_date":1604699522,"thread_id":5540,"user_id":214},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-changes-to-doc002.5540\/post-30717"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed changes to Doc002
The vote has now closed. Thank you.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top