Post #31215

7c5e3989ac58c1917e30e10882c68ca90c8847b57a868d0620c996b1c299140d
24fa9f3d831b582f18489bf3486963a5bda4f49d8d9b49dbd9a1d0a7fa35e792
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1609772276,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"ef9573cc42b87695505d03ee100c6b1bfbbe5f2decd4549c9fb2539d3956b6f28fdd810e66fbfbc5537692a7f40dca894bbe7b3a4749d24c160ce37da64bf9b0","node_id":52,"post_date":1609772237,"thread_id":5628,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-leadership-and-decision-making-vote.5628\/post-31215"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
[QUOTE="Miguel Proulx, post: 31213, member: 84"]
We needed stuff to happen yesterday.
[/QUOTE]

You kinda forfeited that argument when you voted against a ready leadership structure + accompanying tokenomics over a month ago. To be clear, I respect everyone's vote, but you can't have it both ways.

[QUOTE="Miguel Proulx, post: 31213, member: 84"]
Lets remove ANO from the day to day BS, put everyone on the same efficiency, [B]keep ANO as the safe keepers[/B] of this new strong leadership until we are strong enough for a council approach and lets move on quickly please.
[/QUOTE]

That's the thing. If you remove ANOs from formal participation (starting non-veto votes, participating in non-veto votes), you accept that ANOs become an even weaker 'safekeeper'. Less involvement in decisions is less support for those decisions. Less involvement also means they'll be worse (if that's even possible) at monitoring.

If we can tackle that nuance while staying decisive and doing all you've listed, then why not?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top