Post #31216

7c5e3989ac58c1917e30e10882c68ca90c8847b57a868d0620c996b1c299140d
a76df35da3780a5495e766f77f2fca1f102cbbad88b83b8b0b6a4f618bd6fe8d
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1609772271,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"7eca671600f92dd83dab22ac8b1660ca794a6d8954d28b8415680dcc6be421392624f5543a70d485a93b981a93b55ffe7f82557cccef0a6263d99e3a65d0bbba","node_id":52,"post_date":1609772271,"thread_id":5628,"user_id":164},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-leadership-and-decision-making-vote.5628\/post-31216"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
Thanks to everyone that has contributed to this discussion so far.

To ensure we all have a clear understanding for the purposes of this vote, this discussion is to determine the degree to which ANOs will remain involved in making decisions for the protocol. By decision making, we are talking about decision authority as it is defined in community governance for voting on community matters.

This is not a vote on day-to-day community matters, nor is it a vote on if we should have an executive director or a steering committee.

Currently, ANOs hold 100% of decision making authority for the protocol. In a future where the community has an additional entity, such as a steering council or an individual director to guide the community business, ANOs will have to cede a portion of their decision making authority.

This question requires a decision to enable the community to progress governance.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top