Post #31217

7c5e3989ac58c1917e30e10882c68ca90c8847b57a868d0620c996b1c299140d
97ae282dc19a1515fc056ba62b1c5053a933209e029addd40cd2eff13c39421c
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1609773148,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"e3ef8e6d70ae683606eccd0521d1b26da1fd53f053a17f16115eb8dccc13a61b4ec476a8e3480b28067300076cb96ef43e8c79af7ddef97f562081f534e72ee6","node_id":52,"post_date":1609773135,"thread_id":5628,"user_id":84},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-leadership-and-decision-making-vote.5628\/post-31217"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
[QUOTE="WB, post: 31215, member: 175"]
You kinda forfeited that argument when you voted against a ready leadership structure + accompanying tokenomics over a month ago. To be clear, I respect everyone's vote, but you can't have it both ways.
[/QUOTE]
What if a director type of structure is a lot more efficient than a council structure? Even if it doesn't go through either, on the off chance it does the overall expectation of waiting is higher. That being said, we somewhat need to get a decision here, director or council, we need to move on.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top